Notícias | Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as being a screen to the process that is scientific
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-26576,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-4.1.2,vc_responsive

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as being a screen to the process that is scientific

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as being a screen to the process that is scientific

23:04 09 outubro in Best Custom Writing

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as being a screen to the process that is scientific

Present Commentary

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this coming Saturday, on August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a weblog about retractions?”

exactly What is becoming clear into the intervening nine years is exactly what a rich vein retractions are as tales of what goes on when one thing goes incorrect in technology. So that as we now have done each year at the moment, we’ll review what took place within the last few one year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have forfeit a 2019 paper on what LSD may damage vision because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the season before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.

The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal damage in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In line with the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” data doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a couple of researchers in Saudi Arabia after getting a complaint that is“serious about the integrity for the information. However the very first writer of the paper pressed straight straight back, saying the move ended up being unjustified.

The content, “Successful usage of mixed corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” ended up being published by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgical treatment. It described (with instead grisly images) the situation of a man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that solved after the described combination therapy.

But during the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends very first writer of retracted Kumamoto quake paper

The very first writer of a now-retracted paper in technology in regards to the results of the life-threatening 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from their college place for just one year.

Intending Lin, associated with Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned by the organization for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism within the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday reads: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and deceptive eye that is; genetics’ high retraction price

Before we provide this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: would you enjoy our weekly roundup? In that case, we’re able to actually make use of your assistance. Could you look at a tax-deductible contribution to help sunday Reads, and our everyday work Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: can you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever desired to hone your abilities as being a sleuth that is scientific? Now’s your possibility.

Due to the United states Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), which can be invested in educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a set, Forensics Friday.

Take a good look at the image below, and then simply simply simply take our poll. From then on, go through the website website link below to discover the answer that is right.

Share this:

Cock and bull tale contributes to retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients had thing for hybrids (think animals, perhaps perhaps not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with individual torsos, winged horses and lions, you obtain the image. But a mix that is chicken-cown’t on that list … until now.

A team of scientists in Brazil has lost a paper in a journal that is veterinary wanting to reuse information from a chicken study within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

This article, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes mitochondrial disorder in cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never impact virus replication,” starred in February within the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information earn fluorosis paper a banner

A article that is recent offered a stark caution concerning the risks to young ones of fluoride within the nation’s water is tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of a brand new paper which undermines the reliability regarding the initial information.

The content, “Dental fluorosis trends in US oral health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a dental log. The very first author on the paper is Christopher Neurath, for the United states Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

This article, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) when it comes to years 2011 and 2012, reported “large increases in extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to your mid-1980s.

In accordance with the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational areas, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: just exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” go into in a journal that is peer-reviewed?

Often, a paper occurs this is certainly therefore revolutionary, it defies description. So versus make an effort to do justice to a current paper in Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs right right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

A write-up claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern after a audience notified the log about potential issues with the information.

The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of a putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 of the 12 months. Based on the writers — a worldwide group that includes scientists during the National Museum of Natural History, the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

No Comments

Post A Comment