Notícias | Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen to the clinical procedure
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-26564,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-4.1.2,vc_responsive

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen to the clinical procedure

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen to the clinical procedure

10:06 09 outubro in Pay To Write Essay

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen to the clinical procedure

Current Responses

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this Saturday that is coming August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a web log about retractions?”

Just exactly just What has grown to become clear into the intervening nine years is really what a rich vein retractions are as tales of what the results are whenever one thing goes incorrect in technology. And also as we’ve done on a yearly basis at the moment, we’ll review just just what occurred within the last few one year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, lifting meth paper to compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is really a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have actually lost a 2019 paper on what LSD can harm vision because they’d lifted most of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the season before in a new log — about methamphetamine.

The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In accordance with the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a set of scientists in Saudi Arabia after getting a complaint that is“serious about the integrity regarding the information. Nevertheless the very first writer of the paper pressed straight right straight back, saying the move ended up being unjustified.

This article, “Successful usage of mixed corticosteroids and rituximab in someone with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” had been authored by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad health City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic operation. It described (with instead grisly photos) the situation of the 25-year-old guy with serious leg ulcers that fixed after the described combination treatment.

But in the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends very first author of retracted Kumamoto quake paper

The initial writer of a paper that is now-retracted technology in regards to the ramifications of the lethal 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan was suspended from their college position for starters 12 months.

Intending Lin, associated with Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned by the organization for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism within the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has pay for papers resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and deceptive eye that is; genetics’ high retraction rate

Before we present this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: can you enjoy our weekly roundup? In that case, we’re able to actually make use of your help. Can you think about a tax-deductible contribution to help sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Many Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: can you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever desired to hone your talent being a sleuth that is scientific? Now’s your possibility.

Because of the United states Society for Biochemistry and Biology that is molecular(, that is devoted to educating writers on guidelines in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.

Have a look at the image below, and then just simply simply take our poll. From then on, click the website website link below to learn the answer that is right.

Share this:

Cock and bull story results in retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients possessed a plain thing for hybrids (think pets, perhaps not automobiles): half goat-half people, horses with individual torsos, winged horses and lions, you obtain the image. But a mix that is chicken-cown’t on that list … until now.

A small grouping of scientists in Brazil has lost a paper in a veterinary log for attempting to reuse information from the chicken research within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

The content, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never impact virus replication,” starred in February when you look at the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information make fluorosis paper a banner

A recent article that offered a stark caution concerning the dangers to young ones of fluoride within the nation’s water happens to be tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of an innovative new paper which undermines the dependability for the initial information.

This article, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a journal that is dental. The author that is first the paper is Christopher Neurath, for the American Environmental wellness Studies Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

This article, which used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) when it comes to years 2011 and 2012, reported increases that are“large extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to to the mid-1980s.

In accordance with the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational areas, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: exactly exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” go into in a journal that is peer-reviewed?

Often, a paper arrives that is therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore as opposed to make an effort to do justice to a current paper in Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs right right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets expression of concern

Articles claiming to uproot the tree that is evolutionary of has gotten a manifestation of concern after a audience notified the log about possible issues with the info.

The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of a putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 with this 12 months. In accordance with the authors — a team that is international includes researchers during the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

No Comments

Post A Comment